Dr Phil Bate Orthomolecular Pioneerand NT Inventor |
|
|
|
Many different persons and institutions have questioned the effectiveness of EEG Biofeedback (neurofeedback) training for "brain problems" such as ADD/ADHD, Epilepsy, Depression, Anxiety, Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Autism, Brain Injury, etc. One of the statements made by various clinicians has been "There's not enough scientific data on the efficacy of EEG Biofeedback". That statement is garbage and is usually said by someone who hasn't taken the trouble to look up the enormous amount of scientific data and knowledge on this subject. Many MD's and PhD's use this "phrase" to cover their own ignorance. Thanks to Jiri Tyrl of Czechoslovakia who collated the following this shows clearly that EEG BF is effective in virtually all of the following "brain problems".
Epilepsy; ADD/ADHD, Learning Disabilities, Academic-Cognitive Enhancement; Anxiety Disorders, PTSD, Sleep Disorders, Depression, Hemispheric Asymmetry, Anger, Addictive Disorders, Brain Injury, Stroke, Coma, Spasticity, Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, Autoimmune Dysfunctions, Headache and other Pain, Schizophrenia, Obsessive Compulsive Disorders, Parkinson's Dystonia, Tourette's Syndrome, Autism; Cognitive Decline with Aging, Asthma Hypertension Dissociative Disorders, Creativity, Optimal Functioning, Criminal Recidivism.
The following bibliography and the chart (devised by Dr Jiri Tyrl in 2001) shows clearly that for all of the above that there is indeed more than sufficient proof of EEG biofeedback (AKA neurofeedback), however, this does not mean that every clinician will believe, and/or know about it. If your clinician (AND your medical insurer) doesn't know about this very effective solution for all these brain problems, copy these lists, and give to them.
(1991). Clinical psychological treatment of epileptic seizures: A controlled study. Chapter in A. Ehlers et al. (Eds.), Perspectives and Promises of Clinical Psychology. New York: Plenum Press.
.
Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Fibromyalgia, and Autoimmune Dysfunction
Schizophrenia
Sichel, A. G., Fehmi, L. G., and Goldstein, D. M. (1995). Positive outcome with neurofeedback treatment of a case of mild autism. Journal of Neurotherapy, 1(1), 60-64.
Dissociative Disorders
Criminals
From: PhDr Jiri Tyl
I have had enough "not enough studies" mantra. We cannot accept the arguments of our opponents. In internet era, Medline is available for everybody.
Jiri Tyl, Ph.D.,
EEG Biofeedback, Clinical Psychology, Neurology
_______________________________________
DIAGNOSES IN PEER-REVIEWED JOURNALS:
1970-1979 22
TOTAL MEDLINE STUDIES - 131 Please feel free to copy this page, and give it the next medical "expert" that says "There's not enough data on that". That's the "standard" answer when an MD or other clinician is asked about something he/she knows nothing about other than rumors. As you can see from the above, there's a huge amount of data, and almost all of it done by responsible scientists is positive.
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2001 12:48 AM
Subject: [PSYPHY] ENOUGH STUDIES
Clinical Psychologist, EEG Spectrum Affiliate
President, EEG Biofeedback Institute of the Czech Republic
University Hospital Policlinic
Lannova 2, Prague 1
Czech Republic, CZ-110 00
Phone: + 420 602 22 49 64
Fax: + 420 2 2480 2374
E-mail:biofeedback@mbox.vol.cz
URL: www.eegbiofeedback.cz
EFFICACY META-ANALYSIS:
TOTAL: 22
Investigated
Cognitive D. (ADHD)
35
1539
20
7
ANXIETY D.
19
124
15
2
BEHAVIOR D.(incl addictions)
27
285
19
6
EPILEPSY
45
364
42
12
Other-Insomnia, Tics etc.
40
466
27
6
TOTALS
166
2778
123
33
1980-1989 28
1990-1999 85
2000-13
METHOD OF CONTROL
Controlled design (ABAB, sham feedback)
TOTAL MEDLINE JOURNALS - 48
Average per journal 2.8
NON-MEDLINE JOURNALS (6):
Journal of Neurotherapy - 12
Subtle Energies - 1
Journal of Transpersonal Psychology - 1
National Head Injury Syllabus - 1
Dissertations Abstracts - 1
Informatorium (Czech) - 1
TOTAL STUDIES - 17
CRITERIA
SIGNIFICANT STATISTICAL IMPROVEMENT - USAGE IN STUDIES
TOTAL OBJECTIVE MEASURES USED - 31
TOTAL OBJECTIVE MEASURES USAGE - 65
USED MEASURES AVERAGE PER STUDY - 2.1
Number of SUBJECTS in studies reviewed - 1967
In controlled studies - 120